The latest House transcript is from October 27th, when the word of the day was multiculturalism. These are the topics that were discussed.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Canadian Multiculturalism Act Second reading of Bill C-245. The bill seeks to exclude Quebec from Canadian multiculturalism so Quebec can apply its own integration model. The Bloc Québécois argues multiculturalism has never worked for Quebec, which is a distinct nation. Liberals and Conservatives oppose, stating the Act already recognizes that reality, promotes inclusion, and is complementary to Quebec's model, celebrating Canada's diversity and equal opportunities for all. 8100 words, 1 hour.
Citizenship Act Report stage of Bill C-3. The bill amends the Citizenship Act to restore citizenship to individuals who lost status due to a 2009 limit and establish a framework for citizenship by descent. While the government proposes a cumulative 1,095-day physical presence for parents, Conservatives and Bloc Québécois advocate for additional amendments. These include requiring the 1,095 days within a five-year period, language proficiency, a knowledge test, and security assessments, arguing this ensures a substantial connection to Canada and prevents "Canadians of convenience." Liberals view these amendments as undermining the bill's intent and potentially creating new injustices. 18400 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.
Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Members debate the third report of the Ethics Committee, which proposes a review of the Conflict of Interest Act to enhance transparency and prevent conflicts. Conservatives and Bloc members highlight concerns over the Prime Minister's alleged "unprecedented extent of corporate and shareholding interests", the effectiveness of "blind trusts", and the regulation of "tax havens". Liberals question the timing, accusing the opposition of "character assassination" and delaying other legislation, while the opposition asserts the review is legally required for "restoring public confidence" in institutions. 23600 words, 3 hours.