Once again, I find that we are tying the hands of MPs, whereas, as Ken said, the status quo works just fine. There is flexibility, we work on a case by case basis. Often, the analyst from the Library of Parliament asks us if we want a 20 page or 80 page report, and everything is based upon the committee's wishes. We have never argued over the issue of timelines. The last time the conservatives tabled a minority report, I recall David recounting how many days or how much time we had. I am not recall arguing over the matter. On the contrary, we gave parties the time they needed to present a minority report.
Therefore, I would prefer that we continue working this way, not setting timelines that would tie our hands. We already have enough restrictions as it is.