Yes. I'll just add a little bit to that and echo Jim's comments one hundred percent. We have the regulatory process right in this country. It's based on science and it needs to stay based on science. We have to maintain what I call the three-legged stool: safety assessments on food, feed, and the environment. Those are critical to maintain. We have them now.
Is it cumbersome? It probably is. It seems at times that it may be overly cautious, but we would rather err on the side of caution and ensure and be seen as having a technology that is safe in all three areas before we release it for commercialization. I believe we have it right. We have the right balance between safety and enticing investment into developing innovation through this process.
Again, I'll echo Jim's comments on LLP. That's the only addition we might see, but it's kind of outside of this process.
It doesn't hurt to review, but again, I would say that those are principles that we built this system on, and this is the system that has delivered canola, a tremendous opportunity for farmers.