That's a loaded question. Certainly Bill C-234 in its original form was something that the agriculture community applauded because of the relief it was going to give to producers, to primary production.
As has been mentioned many times in this committee, producers are price-takers, not price-setters, so any further costs added to their bottom line have to come out of their bottom line. We appreciated what Bill C-234 represented. Then, unfortunately, it was changed incredibly at the Senate and had to go back to the House.
As is, it is better than nothing. However, our preference would be to have it back in the original form it was in. If it needs to go back to the Senate, so be it. It may not last the lifetime of this government to actually get passed if it were to go back to the Senate. Timing is important around this bill, for sure.