Some substances that are new to Canada have been assessed elsewhere, maybe very thoroughly. Having this information from them would accelerate the process, would it not? If it's good, peer-reviewed science, why would we not want to use it?
October 17th, 2006 / 10:35 a.m.
Conservative
Maurice Vellacott Conservative Saskatoon—Wanuskewin, SK
Some substances that are new to Canada have been assessed elsewhere, maybe very thoroughly. Having this information from them would accelerate the process, would it not? If it's good, peer-reviewed science, why would we not want to use it?
See context to find out what was said next.