I understand that the mandates of the Auditor General and the Commissioner are not to assess whether a program is good or not, but rather to determine whether it has been well administered. Is that correct?
January 31st, 2007 / 4:25 p.m.
Conservative
Luc Harvey Conservative Louis-Hébert, QC
I understand that the mandates of the Auditor General and the Commissioner are not to assess whether a program is good or not, but rather to determine whether it has been well administered. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.