To that point—and I appreciate the comments that Mr. Fast made—if we want to have questioning over the potential policy that's created as to how you select these sites, then I could see how that discussion could be warranted. But when we're basically asking to have a hearing on one particular location that already has a policy in place and a procedure as to how to determine what that location would be in consultation with the minister's office, then I don't see the benefit. I could appreciate it if our objective was to craft or help alter an existing policy, but not necessarily with respect to one particular location.
