I can't comment on Environment Canada's motivation in recommending that the government approve some substandard systems.
I was working in the Ontario Auditor General's office when we audited the large emitter program for Ontario. At the time, it had been branded as providing up to 2.7 megatonnes. Our audit looked at it and said that at most it was going to provide only one megatonne, yet it was still approved. Whether they were approving it to try to show that they were being good federal players, I don't know. That's up to them to answer.
There is, however, no doubt that in terms of issues of national concern under the broad power in the Constitution, this fits in there, and the Supreme Court confirmed it. It wasn't a surprise to anyone in our office that the Supreme Court made that finding, despite the fact that there was a lot of rhetoric and there were cases in Ontario and Alberta and so on about it.
Anyway, that is water under the bridge now. We know that it's constitutional and that now, in this report, is the time to make adjustments so that it's more effective and more fair. That's the next stage and that's what our recommendations are all about.