Evidence of meeting #48 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Laura Farquharson  Director General, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment
Greg Carreau  Director General, Safe Environments Directorate, Department of Health
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

I'm happy to read it out. It's that Bill S-5, in clause 22, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 21 the following: “(3) If more than two years have elapsed after the publication of a statement or an amended statement under subsection (1) or (2), as the case may be, without the minister having published all of the regulations or instruments proposed in the statement, the minister shall publish in the annual report a statement made jointly by the ministers indicating the reasons for the delay and a time frame within which each of the proposed regulations or instruments is to be published.”

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Do we need to debate this subamendment or should we vote on it?

5 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

I believe we talked about extending the 24 months to 42 months.

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

I wonder whether that's necessary, if we now have an annual report rather than an environmental registry.

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay.

Shall we vote?

5 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

I'll ask for some input on that as well from the officials before we vote.

Does this address some of the concerns you have about the overburden on resources? That would be helpful.

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Wait a moment, please.

In your original version, apparently you didn't have the words “as the case may be”.

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

I apologize. I may have been reading from an alternate draft.

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Then we don't need—

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

You can take “as the case may be” out.

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay.

We have Ms. Collins.... No.

I'm a little confused here, because we're on the subamendment.

Ms. Collins or Mr. Kurek, do you wish to speak on the subamendment or the whole amendment?

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

I'd like to hear from the officials. I may then have something to say—

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Is this on the subamendment?

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

No, it's on the amendment, but I would like to hear what the officials have to say.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay.

Ms. Taylor Roy, do you wish to speak on the subamendment?

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Yes, please. It's on the subamendment, but I guess.... No, it's not.

The annual reports—

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

It's on the amendment.

Okay, let's go to the amendment. We have Ms. Collins, Mr. Kurek and Ms. Taylor Roy, but we're going to hear from the officials first.

5:05 p.m.

Director General, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, Environmental Protection Branch, Department of the Environment

Laura Farquharson

I would say that reporting in the annual report is better than reporting each time, in terms of administrative burden.

I'm not sure.... I was listening to the subamendment. Having a statement by both ministers in the annual report doesn't make sense to me, the way it's written. I'm trying to figure it out, because I think you've already passed a section about the annual report.

I'm wondering about the placement of it.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Go ahead, Ms. Collins.

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

I think the difference is that the one we passed doesn't require indicating the reasons for the delay or a time frame within which each of the proposed regulations or instruments would be published. I think that's the difference.

If the officials have suggestions for language that would be better, rather than the joint statement, I'm very open.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

I'm not sure they're permitted to offer language for amendments. I don't think so. I could be wrong.

We're still on the subamendment.

Go ahead, Ms. Taylor Roy.

Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

It's not on the subamendment. I want to speak on the amendment.

Now that it's in the annual report.... I guess the subamendment changes the amendment to some extent, because now it's in the annual report.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Well, we have to vote on the subamendment, so let's vote on the subamendment. Then we can then keep talking about the amendment.

Go ahead, Mr. Clerk.

(Subamendment agreed to: yeas 6; nays 5)

The subamendment passes, so we can now go back to the amendment.

I have Ms. Collins, Mr. Kurek and Ms. Taylor Roy.

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

I think I'll pass it along and hear from my colleagues before I say anything.

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Go ahead, Mr. Kurek.