Thank you.
I do think that reporting on each substance as it gets delayed is a good approach. I understand that it would take more resources, so I am also open to ensuring that we have a requirement for reasons for updating the timelines. Currently we do have a requirement for a progress report in the annual report, but that's not the same thing as updating Parliament on the reasons for the delay and providing a new estimated timeline.
The fact is that we do see delays in adding toxic substances, and we need accountability, not just transparency. That said, if we could find support around the table to amend this to have the requirement in the annual report rather than in the environmental registry, perhaps that would allay some of the concerns.
However, I cannot amend my own amendment.