The fact-finding report has very limited scope and very limited methodology, and it was being directed by judgmental samples from the complainants report, so it's certainly not exhaustive.
It's not a detailed forensic audit, and all we received, really, were indications that some of the allegations might have merit, and the intent, as I indicated, was always to determine whether next steps would be required. But that is hardly sufficient grounds to terminate an individual or to take stronger measures—and, again, this is why I feel that the minister responded appropriately in this regard.