My point remains the same: On this food table, you will not be able to do year over year comparisons.
This is in striking contrast to your counterparts in the United States and other countries, where they've actually kept the two tables going. They've got the new one, which rightfully reflects perhaps the more modern examples of diet, but they enable you to also continue to track on the old one.
Presuming everything is in today and it's just a matter of updating, why would you not just go ahead and keep updating that on the food table? At a time when we're facing record inflation, people—those in my riding, quite frankly, who are having a difficult time affording food—and academics and others who study this will not have the ability to continue to understand and fully monitor the increase in food prices.