Yes.
Again, I think it's a very good question. As Anne pointed out, I think we've made tremendous progress with ballast water, such that it's maybe not at the top of the list. I certainly would be very fearful if we backed off in any way or were seen to slide backwards, because when we look at the number of species that arrive through ballast water and at the time course, the threat is very real. There are thousands of ships crossing the ocean and entering the Great Lakes waterways, so we can't back off on this.
However, to get to your question about the education side of things, I think, as Anne has pointed out and just as this meeting is accomplishing, it's by educating and helping people understand the problems.... Whether it's working with the shipping industry—which we educated, and which has worked with us to develop measures—or with the public and individuals and communities, or with angling groups, yes, I think the area of education and outreach is probably a priority area for us to focus on. But it can't come about by compromising the efforts that we've put into some of these other measures.
If we were to turn our backs on sea lamprey control, in just a couple of years we would be back 50 years and dealing with the decimation of Great Lakes fish stocks. We can't take money out of that program to enhance another.