Yes.
Without getting into detail, there's not much I can really add, other than to say that I think your point is very important. We need to understand the biology. On the question that came up earlier about predicting the next species, if we don't understand the basic biology, we can't undertake these basic biological and economic risk assessments, and then we can't assess the harm, which means we could be putting money into places where it could be better invested.
So yes, I think we need to do the basic science, and I think, as Anne has pointed out, we're not necessarily anticipating changes there. We do need to do basic collection to understand things, but it's hard to anticipate specifically with any one of these proposed changes what it may actually mean around that acquisition or collection of data.