Yes, thank you.
I share the frustration and the uncertainty around what we've heard, because a former colleague of ours is working with the commission and has been critical of Canada's response and its follow-through. That said, though, we'd like to propose an amendment to Mr. Arnold's motion that we undertake a study of a minimum of three two-hour meetings, and that we invite the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the chair of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission to appear as witnesses separately, not concurrently. We think there could be a far more productive review and analysis, rather than having the two of them getting into a sparring match in front of our very eyes. That's the amendment we're proposing.