I wanted to propose the following. Since we've heard from witnesses a couple of concerns, and they're not major.... We're going to support the bill, and I think people are aware of that, and I think everyone's supportive of the bill, but there are a couple of issues that were brought up during the brief period we had to review this. One of them, which Mr. Dechert brought it up, is with regard to the section that deals with increasing the sentencing to 14 years, and looking at how that could be applied when you're looking at domestic law being different in, say, five years.
The facts around the issue of facilitation payments and how this might touch on or affect charitable organizations were valid concerns that were brought up. I'm wondering if the government would be open to having a provision for review put into the bill, so that after five years, the government would commit to reviewing the legislation.
I say that, Mr. Chair, for the aforementioned reasons. As I said, I think everyone around this table is in support of the bill, but given the concerns around applications and at least two things that I just mentioned, including in terms of the maximum penalty, a concern that Mr. Dechert shares, could we consider putting into the bill a review after five years of the legislation coming into force? I'm just wondering if we could have a discussion about an amendment on a five-year review.