On that point, you have mentioned that quiet diplomacy is the way Canada functions and that sometimes public amplification could risk the security of the individuals we are attempting to support and help. My colleague Mr. Oliphant had an extensive exchange on this with the drafter of the bill.
Can you be a bit more specific? In a previous question, you said that having such a list could impede the advancement of discussions that would lead to results. In perhaps more plain language, do you think the security of the individuals Canada is trying to support and protect would be at risk? Do you think we could actually harm the individuals we're trying to help?