On the motion, I have a question for clarification. I want to ensure that the proposal with respect to witnesses.... It just needs to be clearly understood by everyone that this is in addition to the witnesses who are prescribed in the motion. I need to understand that this isn't replacing it, because we don't have the subamendment in writing, and that the subamendment does not remove the named witnesses, those being the consul general, the deputy minister, named representatives from Supply Canada and Treasury Board and the minister of global affairs. Those witnesses need to still be included. I need to understand if that's what we're voting on.
Further, if the meetings are to be held between the 19th and 27th, whatever the date is that is being proposed—21 or 15—we need to have an assurance through you, Mr. Chair, from the House that we're going to be able to have those documents translated for that first meeting of the committee. To Mrs. Vignola's original point, the documents need to be in our hands in both official languages prior to the opening of the window for these meetings to occur, and I need to just get some clarity that the named witnesses, in addition to the proposal for the submission of additional witnesses, remain, and that's in addition to those witnesses.