To answer the question, to make sure, there are two ways to go, and the first one is always that the committee is the master of its own domain, if that's what you want to do.
My thinking as chair, however, is that if we vote this through to the House, that's when you would have your opinions. The vote now is on the votability of the report. So as Monsieur Guimond succinctly pointed out, we're voting that for this private member's bill, we're either accepting the report of the subcommittee that this is in violation of the Constitution and therefore is deemed not votable, or we don't vote in the report of the subcommittee, which makes the private member's bill deemed votable. That's where we're at—end of story.
If it goes back to the House because we voted it through, that's when your debates will begin; that's when the committees will study it; that's when the witnesses will happen. That's my understanding.
If it does not go through, Madame Picard has one more process of appeal, and I think Madame Picard knows full well the process of getting five members with the majority of the official opposition.
So that's where I see we're going.
I'm going to continue with my list, with Monsieur Godin, Mr. Lukiwski, and Monsieur Proulx.