I guess that's where I'm a little confused. Your testimony was actually quite strong and firm that this is a right, and it is a right in the Constitution, and all legislation must fall under that. Where your position weakens a little bit is that you're suggesting remedies to that. But if I had not read your last two points, I would have said that we can actually do nothing, that courts will uphold this right, as they would any other constitutional right. So in fact it might be best—the way the clerk's nodding, perhaps it is best—
