That's a fair question.
As a parent of three children, I have also had my kids in a variety of child care facilities at different times, so I'm aware that there are some that are of a very high quality. That's one of the reasons we grandfathered the existing ones.
I guess there would be two answers to that. The first one is, it's questionable whether public money should go into for-profit businesses. It seems to me to be a kind of unfair subsidy. That's the first answer.
The other is that it was an attempt to prevent public money from going to for-profit businesses where, for example, there would be shareholders—the large, corporate kind of child care that's occurred in some jurisdictions where there's been a policy gap or the absence of criteria such as these. That would be the main concern.
But the existing ones, the high-quality ones that you mentioned, have been grandfathered in.