What you're saying then is that if there was, for lack of a better word, a terrorism group that was identified, let's say by the UN, although the group may be inadmissible, a person within that group could be admissible?
Conservative
David Wilks Conservative Kootenay—Columbia, BC
What you're saying then is that if there was, for lack of a better word, a terrorism group that was identified, let's say by the UN, although the group may be inadmissible, a person within that group could be admissible?
See context to find out what was said next.