Right.
With a private member's bill, the entire process passes within four hours of debate, there is a limited number of speakers, and individuals such as you will be invited to a committee. I'm wondering to what degree there's an obligation, given that the minister has brought in something potentially totally new that establishes a second class of citizenship—which a lot of the discussion has been about—to find a better way to address the broader issue by allowing for more thorough debate on the issue before a decision is made.
Would that be advice that you would provide?