Thank you very much.
I'm going to turn to the officials now, if I could.
Again, this question relates to rebutting this point about chain migration and Bill C-3 and is for whoever wishes to take it.
Can you talk to us about the fact that the bill embraces a cumulative approach of 1,095 days as opposed to a consecutive approach? Touch on that. The 1,095 days is, as we know, three years. How does that compare to permanent residency requirements? Is that consecutive or cumulative days with respect to permanent residency?
I'm interested in seeing if Bill C-3 aligns with requirements for permanent residency in Canadian law.