I'm going to speak in English, because there are too many technical terms to interpret in Inuktitut.
In terms of what is being presumed to be more concise in clause 11 and what my amendment is trying to do, is there anything in the legislation that provides for the opportunity for first nations that might...? We know that different first nations will have their own sets of laws. If there are two different first nations that have inconsistencies or conflicts within each of their own laws, are there spaces where, absent my amendment, the opportunity for conflict resolution is created?
What clause 11 does not do, which my amendment does, for example, is assess distinct traditions, customs and practices of first nations. I need to point out that this is not just about conciseness. Clause 11 only speaks to first nations laws prevailing with respect to different sections of the act as well as legislation in Canada, but not with respect to conflicts or inconsistencies that might exist between first nations.