Okay. Thank you. That's definitely something that we need to include in our study.
I'll turn to OpenMedia.
We've had a lot of conflicting testimony, which is why we do these things. We don't want everybody agreeing. I'm wondering where you would sit in terms of the protection of revenue for creators when you look at, let's say, things like resale right, reversionary right, for copyright to go back to the artist after a set amount of time, or granting journalists remuneration rights so that people who are using photos, as an example—revenue used to go to the original photographer.
How does that fit, in terms of the openness you're describing to us today?