From what I understand, the former privacy commissioner of Quebec also said that the current version of the bill had the weakness of allowing a government to regulate somewhat in a vacuum.
I'm really trying to get a sense of what the right thing to do is.
Mr. Masse's amendment says that, in case of doubt, the aggrieved person is always right. So the standard is very high.
In the initial version of the bill, the government tells us that it will let industry determine best practices and that people will live with the consequences.
We're looking for a middle ground in the compromise. I'm trying to understand the nature of the trade‑off from a regulatory perspective.
Do you understand?