I'm asking you the question precisely because that has happened many times.
You said we need a new institution, new people nominated, a new tribunal and a new building because the Federal Court doesn't have the necessary expertise.
Here's my reasoning. My own impression is that creating this new institution might have the effect of discrediting the Commissioner. We're told we need a new tribunal that has the necessary expertise. The stated justification for that is that the Commissioner's decisions are often invalidated by the Federal Court, which therefore has the necessary expertise to do so. However, if we tell you we prefer to go directly to the Federal Court, we're told it doesn't have the necessary expertise.
For someone for with an IQ over 80, that's completely illogical.