First, on your point about the amendments, Mr. Généreux, you know how much I respect you, but you cannot blame us for listening to you. We took this approach in order to come up with something concrete. The worst thing would be to wait for clause-by-clause consideration to propose our amendments. We listened to you and that is why we are proposing amendments in the direction you suggested. There are two ways of looking at it, one of which is “good, a minister is listening”. That's a good thing, at least we are going in the same direction as you requested.
Regarding the public consultations, you will see tomorrow that I am in contact with many people in the field of artificial intelligence. There are of course many people with something to say about it, but we do consult broadly. We already have a good relationship with the artificial intelligence companies in Canada; we know them very well. We have a national strategy, we consulted experts, including Yoshua Bengio, one of the founders of artificial intelligence, who has a group around him and was appointed to the Scientific Advisory Council established by the UN secretary general. So there are quite a number of people who have stated their views. We are in contact with people who are world leaders in the field of artificial intelligence.