That's an excellent question.
It's catastrophic. Reuters also put out a special report on this. As we mentioned, Canada can seek to lead efforts at the UN to remove the consent of the state. A lot of times, countries say that Sudan has the right and that we need its consent, but there's no governing party right now. There's no effective legitimate leader right now who can lay claim to this.
This is a problem of international scope that demands our responsibility to protect civilians in the areas you mentioned, and the removal of obstacles or impediments to letting the trucks go through. This is something Canada and the House can demand—that the requirement for consent of state be removed—because these people are starving to death. It makes no sense to allow the Sudanese Armed Forces to continue blocking that aid. It's the same with the RSF.
I also want to quickly clarify something, because it sounds like there is some confusion in the room around it. Sudan is a massive country. The reason you hear about Darfur a lot is that the situation in Darfur is quite different. The RSF controls most of the region. In north Darfur, there's only one SAF garrison left and joint forces fighting off the RSF's siege. I talked about the RSF atrocities and the UAE's support for them. It's continuing the genocide and massacres of the Massalit, Fur and Zaghawa peoples. The UN found that 81% of the rape and sexual violence was committed by the RSF.
The conflict has to be understood. It's not simply two belligerents. They are committing different sorts of crimes. Whereas the SAF, like I said, is blocking the aid and potentially contributing to deaths by starvation and committing air strikes and war crimes, killing civilians in that context—