Now can we get to the witness list?
How do you want to handle this? I would suggest that if each party has a list of witnesses ready, or will very soon, as you're saying, Mr. LeBlanc, we have, at the meeting on July 31.... We may find that we can handle all the witnesses who are suggested at the meeting on July 31. We have the minister from 10 till noon. I think that's been agreed to. I would suggest that we have panels of four witnesses at a time, from both sides of the issue, not picking only witnesses who oppose or agree, and that we have hearings of an hour to an hour and a half for each group. Does that sound reasonable to the members? Can we go about it that way?
All right. Now can we get to the actual lists? How shall we handle that? Can it be left to the chair? I certainly will have balanced groupings of witnesses, and I can send those out to the members and see, or do you want to decide right here? It might not be a bad idea to decide right here who the witnesses will be at that meeting. We could certainly do that.
Mr. LeBlanc, in your case, where you may not have witnesses nailed down, we could leave some room to add those to a spot later.
Mr. LeBlanc.