I don't know if I can comment on the timelines you asked for, but I can comment on a couple of components.
The exemption for the border mills was based on three factors: the volume of wood that came from the United States; the volume of wood that was purchased from the Maritimes, given the recognition of those unique circumstances; and the volume of wood from private lands in Quebec.
I don't pretend to be an expert, but as I see it, there is one difference in the management of the exemption, which is that, despite previous exemptions, no other area in Canada has invested in an anti-circumvention program as the Maritimes have been doing for 10 years. We have a database separate from Stats Can, and which we reconcile with the United States. We control those shipments rigorously. This control mechanism has formed part of the basis of that recognition.
When you talk about wood coming in from Quebec to the Maritimes and job losses, this agreement actually prevents that—at our request. It's part of the anti-circumvention mechanism, and if logs from Quebec come into the Maritimes for further processing, they are counted as to the origin of the logs, which would be Quebec. So this takes away any motivation for that to happen.