I will address the question of under what circumstances should the deal not be signed. In order to answer that, you have to consider the alternative. The alternative to not signing the deal is to continue the litigation, continue the fight against the U.S. I have to tell you that no country in the world, no industry in the world, without the support of its government, can fight an attack from the U.S. government fully supporting its industry. We can't do that without the government's support.
We've been told that this is the deal, take it or leave it, and if you leave it don't expect support. Under these circumstances, given the state of the industry after four or five years of being bled to death, I doubt the industry would use its so-called veto, because it's a party to these litigations. It has to agree to drop these legal suits. I doubt, as we speak now, it would re-exercise that veto. It's just too badly off. That's unfortunate, in my view, but that's the situation we're in now.