Indeed. We were saying that for the last 10 years, Russian and Chinese production has been stagnating. Rio Tinto seemed to say that our production had remained the same and that it had not been affected.
I want to remind you what's happened in Quebec over the last 10 years. Rio Tinto closed the Beauharnois plant and the Shawinigan plant. They were old plants.
The next plant to close, the oldest one in existence, is ours. Basically, what we want is to have a future in terms of production at the AP-60 plant during phases 2 and 3, so that after the closure of our plant, which is at the end of its life, we can look forward to a future at the AP-60 plant. That is what the debate is about.
When it is said that China's production has had no effect on Rio Tinto's production, it is not true. Two plants in Quebec have closed, and ours is next on the list. I don't think the Alma plant will be closed before ours.