Thank you.
My next one is to Dr. Bercuson, because, Dr. Bland, I know what you think of this.
There have been a number of studies that have been passed off as scientific to project the number of casualties. One was by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, which did a simple mathematical calculation and said that if we carry this on till February 2009, we'll lose another 140 troops. I would go back to Dieppe, which Dr. Bland brought up. If we did the same simplistic mathematical calculation, taking that one day's figures, it would have said we would lose 900,000 Canadians before the end of the Second World War.
Dr. Bercuson, what do you think of the relevance of those kinds of pseudo-scientific studies, and why do they seem to get traction with some sectors of the Canadian public?