Thank you, sir.
The first question was with respect to the capacity required and the impact of operations in Afghanistan. I would make the point, sir, really, to set the scene, that what we are talking about are two extremely different types of operation. We are operating in equipment in Afghanistan intended for employment in a war zone. Therefore, the type of equipment we have, the training of the soldiers who go there, and the employment of the aircraft there are predominantly meant for a hostile environment. They are intended to enable people to survive the violence of the enemy.
The situation we perceive in Vancouver will not be a hostile environment with respect to the rate of usage of equipment. Your question to me is whether I am confident that we have sufficient capacity to address both the international mission and a major domestic mission--the Olympics--at the same time. My answer to that is yes. I have no doubt that we are being very tough on the equipment in Afghanistan, because that's the environment in which it's being used. I'm not really the fellow to give you an answer as to the rates. But I do not, at the moment, perceive there to be a difficulty with respect to usage rates in Afghanistan and how that will affect the availability of resources for supporting the operation in Vancouver, even for the Griffon helicopters. Sir, the Griffon helicopters we have deployed are specifically planned and tailored to deal with combat missions. Those are not the Griffon helicopters we will be using in Vancouver, where they have a surveillance mission.