I don't tend to skirt a question, but this one I will. I don't have Justice Lamer's exact wording, which you obviously have before you, to see whether or not this is the interpretation one can give to it. I have never questioned Justice Lamer, because I have too much respect for him. I have argued that his recommendations should be applied, including the creation of a permanent military court. But on the issue of summary trials, I'm going above and beyond what the Lamer report said. I'm saying it doesn't meet the test in today's world.