In my opinion, it is not because we make information available to the public that the appearance of justice is protected. Who is going to handle that? Who is going to start an outcry, who is going to alert the public because that person thinks a decision was rendered improperly? For me, it seems that a superior issues directives to the provost marshall, who administers justice to the Department of National Defence. I want to preserve the principle. It does not involve calling the public to witness all the decisions. That is not satisfactory.
