I understand Mr. Bachand's concerns, but that's exactly what it says, if you read proposed subsection 18.5(2): “The Vice Chief of the Defence Staff may issue general instructions or guidelines”, and the last part of it says, “The Provost Marshal shall ensure that they are available to the public.” Proposed subsection 18.5(3) says: “The Vice Chief of the Defence Staff may issue instructions or guidelines in writing in respect of a particular investigation.” And proposed subsection 18.5(4) says: “The Provost Marshal shall ensure that instructions and guidelines issued under subsection (3) are available to the public.”
So in both cases the provost marshal shall ensure that those are made available to the public. They aren't being treated differently; they're being treated exactly the same.