First of all, there is some dispute between our view and the MDS Nordion view of that 40-year agreement. I don't want to get too far down a path of discussing our legal situation, but I need to say that you made the statement on the presumption that we have a 40-year supply agreement. Our view is that the agreement was conditional upon the completion of the MAPLE reactor on time, and that did not occur, so we have to resolve an issue surrounding the interpretation of the agreement.
I think it's very important to say that we believe we're acting within the terms of our agreement.