A lot of what my colleague here is explaining is the rationale behind the $650 million limit, which is not in clause 15. Clause 15 covers economic loss by a person who has been physically injured or has had property damage, and clause 15 doesn't discuss whether it's a design-basis accident or a catastrophic incident. So when we are talking about the distinction between a design-basis accident and a catastrophic incident, we're actually out of the scope of clause 15. Clause 15 is providing that somebody who's injured in this way gets compensated under the act.
