One reading of subclause 16(1) would allow for that type of compensation to be imagined. We talk about wage losses. Now the operator itself, especially if the employees are represented by a union...I'm not sure why, under this subclause, they would be....
I'm not imagining a one-week shutdown here, right? If we're talking about a nuclear accident, we're talking about something rather prolonged, in terms of when those folks can get back to work.
You've said that the operators themselves are excluded from seeking any damages under Bill C-20. They can't say the soil around Pickering is now contaminated and they want cleanup money under this compensation. That makes no sense, and the bill excludes it, but I don't understand....