How much freedom does the court or tribunal have in determining what “reasonable” is? Is it a great latitude? I'm imagining that somebody comes in front of a judge or at a tribunal and says, “I cleaned up this body of water. I did it immediately; I wasn't sanctioned by the province”, and the judge says, “Well, that's unreasonable because it wasn't sanctioned by the province”. Is that an example of how someone may not get compensated for cleanup after a nuclear incident?
