To build on Glenn's comments, from our perspective as a nuclear operator, our top priority is to ensure there is a process available that ensures this liability is fully funded, right? Since we're leasing the facility from Ontario Power Generation and the Province of Ontario, what's important for us is that when our facility ceases operation, we have fully funded that liability through our operational streams for whatever the best solution is as determined by the NWMO.
To give you a sense of what that liability looks like, there's a significant focus on fuel, but just to put the cost in perspective, right now we're paid about $66 a megawatt for all of our output on the Bruce Power site. About $4 of that $66 covers the cost of fuel. The most important issue for us, Ms. Gallant, is really that we ensure this is a fully funded liability based on the best available technology at the time.
It's really up to the NWMO to decide on the best available technology to deploy. The best-case scenario for our industry—and I think Ms. Swami mentioned they're always on the lookout for what's going on with new technology—is that we could actually have an overfunded liability down the road if technology progresses, but we have to make some assumptions based on what's available to us now and make sure we're funding to that. From our perspective, that's critical.