I have a point of order.
My understanding is that Mr. Falk challenged the chair because he isn't second, so we should keep it simple. It's that Mr. Falk goes second. That's what we're going to vote on.
Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON
I have a point of order.
My understanding is that Mr. Falk challenged the chair because he isn't second, so we should keep it simple. It's that Mr. Falk goes second. That's what we're going to vote on.
See context to find out what was said next.