Chair, I would contest that, because we missed an important part of the meeting that you said we were going to do before the motion to adjournment was made. Obviously, we're moving backward in the agenda. That motion wouldn't count, and I've asked to speak.
I'd like to welcome the analyst, because I have worked with her frequently over the years in natural resources. She is an exceptional, unbiased, objective and expert assistant in every committee on which I've had the pleasure to work with her.
It seems to me that, since the agenda seems to be new, this motion wouldn't be valid, because we missed part of the meeting.
In the course of my comments, I would like to move a motion that wasn't on notice, but since we haven't met before, this is, of course, my first opportunity.
It is:
That, given that Trudeau era anti-energy laws, including Bill C-69—