Mr. Chair, I would like to raise a question. Is the court not there for individual citizens? Is it not the individual citizens who are important? Is it not the place where one can be heard with passion, as you said earlier? You said it yourself. It's better to hear from the individuals themselves, in their language, as they speak with passion and so forth. Now, you are telling me to write a letter to the Supreme Court justices. I am not the one appointing the Supreme Court justices.
Do you agree with me that it is preferable to hear individuals directly rather than through the interpretation? The court's decision hinges on that. Why not have, at the Supreme Court, justices who will respect—and I'm talking about the appointment process—both official languages of our country?