I'll repeat what I said. We work on a case-by-case basis, and we'll look at how we can proceed going forward.
There's something I'd like to clarify. You're right that we didn't have access to some information, but it wasn't essential in order to determine that the complaint was not valid.
Canadian Heritage had not done its job because, in terms of the answers provided, certain gaps remained regarding the $25-million allocation. Who did the money go to? Did it go to the English-speaking community in Quebec, the French-speaking communities outside Quebec or both?
Above all, however, we were not able to clearly show that the agreement had had a negative impact on the communities. That's the crux of Judge Gascon's decision. That doesn't mean that there won't be a negative impact in the future, at which point, a new complaint could be filed. The act very much limits what we can do in that area.