Although, in terms of education or health, we would be touching on that sacrosanct division of provincial and federal powers.
In the official languages act, is it a constitutional breach to say that the federal government has obligations and that the money will go exactly where the linguistic community needs it?
There are calls for accountability—I'm thinking of British Columbia as an example—but no one knows where the money is going to meet the needs of minority communities.
You are a constitutional expert. Do you think it would be tenable, from a legal standpoint, to insert this element in the official languages act?