Perhaps I can cite some examples.
Magazines or periodicals seeking assistance must, in general, sell 5,000 copies or have 5,000 subscribers. However, that figure is lowered to 2,500 for minority publications.
Generally speaking, they must also have sold 50% of their distributed copies. However, that requirement is lowered for minority magazines.
A minimum subscription price of $12 is set for magazines in general. However, that price is dropped to one dollar for minority community media.
Consequently, various measures such as these facilitate access to publications from minority communities.
Now, we have to know the net result because that is what ultimately counts.
Funding for most minority publications has therefore increased, but that is not true in all cases. The reverse has occurred in three, four, or five cases, and that has raised a lot of questions and reactions. This is the kind of issue we are examining: how to manage this situation?